Suryabhan Tikambuva Ban vs Duryodhan Tikambuva Ban — 96/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHBI190004242025

e-Filing Number

18-02-2025

Filing Number

128/2025

Filing Date

05-Mar-2025

Registration No

96/2025

Registration Date

05-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Ashti

Judge

1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suryabhan Tikambuva Ban

    Adv. DESHPANDE SHRIKRISHNA TRYMBAKRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Duryodhan Tikambuva Ban

  2. 2.Muktabai Bhausaheb Giri

  3. 3.Kashinath Bhausaheb Giri

  4. 4.Navnath Bhausaheb Giri

  5. 5.Rajkumar Namdev Tekade

  6. 6.Sanjay Namdev Tekade

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Court Order Summary Petition ALLOWED. The court granted a temporary injunction restraining Defendants 5 and 6 from carrying out any construction on the disputed property (Survey Nos. 46/A and 46/B, measuring 55 acres) until the final judgment or further orders. The plaintiff's rights as a co-owner were found to merit protection against alleged encroachment and unauthorized construction by the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  11. 21-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  12. 23-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  13. 28-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  14. 03-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  15. 03-Oct-2025

    Issues

    3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    Issues

    3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  17. 21-Jul-2025

    Issues

    3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  18. 21-Jul-2025

    Issues

    3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  19. 21-Jul-2025

    Issues

    3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  20. 30-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  21. 05-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 05-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 96/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Petition ALLOWED. The court granted a temporary injunction restraining Defendants 5 and 6 from carrying out any construction on the disputed property (Survey Nos. 46/A and 46/B, measuring 55 acres) until the final judgment or further orders. The plaintiff's rights as a co-owner were found to merit protection against alleged encroachment and unauthorized construction by the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case