Saudagar Abdul Baki Gulam Mustafa vs Ashruba Sopan Neharkar Died Advocate - Chate A.T. — 65/2023
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th April 2026.
Civil M.A.
CNR: MHBI180041112023
Filing Number
1320/2023
Filing Date
30-08-2022
Registration No
65/2023
Registration Date
02-09-2022
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Kaij
Judge
3-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saudagar Abdul Baki Gulam Mustafa
Adv. Sasane A.K.
Respondent(s)
Ashruba Sopan Neharkar Died Advocate - Chate A.T.
Sahebrao Sopan Neharkar
Chintaman Sopan Neharkar
Mathurabai Sopan Neharkar died(Legal Heir)
Chandrakant Haribhau Neharkar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Disposed
Evidence
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 25-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 17-12-2025 | Steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court allowed the appellant's application to condone the delay in filing an appeal against a property decree dated 24/11/2021, which was filed on 30/08/2022. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, including the death of the appellant's three brothers and the COVID-19 pandemic, and held that the appellant had the right to appeal as an aggrieved party under a permanent injunction. The appeal was permitted to proceed upon payment of Rs. 3,000 costs to the respondents within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the appellant's application to condone the delay in filing an appeal against a property decree dated 24/11/2021, which was filed on 30/08/2022. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, including the death of the appellant's three brothers and the COVID-19 pandemic, and held that the appellant had the right to appeal as an aggrieved party under a permanent injunction. The appeal was permitted to proceed upon payment of Rs. 3,000 costs to the respondents within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts