State of Maharashtra - P.I. Police Station, Yusuf Wadgaon vs Ashok Fulchand Shinde Advocate - Shinde N.D. — 66/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Spl.Case

CNR: MHBI180023232023

Evidence

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

Filing Number

501/2023

Filing Date

26-04-2021

Registration No

66/2023

Registration Date

27-04-2021

Court

District and Additional Sessions Court Kaij

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

YUSUF WADGAON POLICE STATION

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(R)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra - P.I. Police Station, Yusuf Wadgaon

Respondent(s)

Ashok Fulchand Shinde Advocate - Shinde N.D.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij

17-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

08-01-2026

Evidence

11-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

24-07-2023
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court framed charges against accused Ashok under IPC Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 504 (intentional insult), and Section 3(1)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found prima facie sufficient evidence that the accused slapped and verbally abused the informant based on caste (Mahar) in public view. The accused, who was present, has been called upon to answer the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court framed charges against accused Ashok under IPC Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 504 (intentional insult), and Section 3(1)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found prima facie sufficient evidence that the accused slapped and verbally abused the informant based on caste (Mahar) in public view. The accused, who was present, has been called upon to answer the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Additional Sessions Court Kaij All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case