State of Maharashtra - P.I. Police Station, Yusuf Wadgaon vs Ashok Fulchand Shinde Advocate - Shinde N.D. — 66/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
Spl.Case
CNR: MHBI180023232023
Filing Number
501/2023
Filing Date
26-Apr-2021
Registration No
66/2023
Registration Date
27-Apr-2021
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Kaij
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
YUSUF WADGAON POLICE STATION
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra - P.I. Police Station, Yusuf Wadgaon
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ashok Fulchand Shinde Advocate - Shinde N.D.
Case History
-
04-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
29-May-2025
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
11-Dec-2024
N.B.W._Ready
District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
21-Oct-2024
N.B.W._Ready
District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
21-Sep-2024
N.B.W._Ready
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
22-Jul-2024
N.B.W._Ready
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
28-Jun-2024
N.B.W._Ready
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
17-May-2024
N.B.W._Ready
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
25-Apr-2024
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
28-Mar-2024
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
22-Feb-2024
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
25-Jan-2024
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
08-Jan-2024
List of Witness
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
19-Dec-2023
List of Witness
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
21-Nov-2023
List of Witness
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
06-Oct-2023
List of Witness
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
05-Sep-2023
List of Witness
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
-
24-Jul-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
24-Jul-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court framed charges against accused Ashok under IPC Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 504 (intentional insult), and Section 3(1)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found prima facie sufficient evidence that the accused slapped and verbally abused the informant based on caste (Mahar) in public view. The accused, who was present, has been called upon to answer the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Apr-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 66/2023
Summary: The court framed charges against accused Ashok under IPC Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 504 (intentional insult), and Section 3(1)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found prima facie sufficient evidence that the accused slapped and verbally abused the informant based on caste (Mahar) in public view. The accused, who was present, has been called upon to answer the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts