Shukracharya Sundarrao Neharkar vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 69/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBI180001562026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
106/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
69/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Kaij
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
133
Police Station
KAIJ POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shukracharya Sundarrao Neharkar
Adv. INGLE DADARAJE BALASAHEB
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ABC Name and detail addressmentioned in FIR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
Disposed
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to Shukracharya Sundarrao Neharkar in a case involving kidnapping and POCSO Act violations of a 12-year-old girl. The judge found that prosecution's allegations were limited to the applicant giving money to the victim's stepfather for marriage purposes, the money was unrecovered, and there was a family dispute involved, making the applicant entitled to bail protection. The applicant was released on Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance with conditions including bi-weekly police station attendance and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to Shukracharya Sundarrao Neharkar in a case involving kidnapping and POCSO Act violations of a 12-year-old girl. The judge found that prosecution's allegations were limited to the applicant giving money to the victim's stepfather for marriage purposes, the money was unrecovered, and there was a family dispute involved, making the applicant entitled to bail protection. The applicant was released on Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance with conditions including bi-weekly police station attendance and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts