Sumer Bhoraramsingh Choudhary vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 62/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBI180001372026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
95/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
62/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Kaij
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
08
Police Station
DHARUR POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sumer Bhoraramsingh Choudhary
Adv. DEODHARE ANMOL JITENDRA
Omaram Bhikaram Jaat
Adv. DEODHARE ANMOL JITENDRA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Omaram Bhikharam Jaat, finding a prima facie case against him under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and BNS 2023 for allegedly bringing a victim from Rajasthan to Maharashtra under bonded labor conditions, confining him, and subjecting him to caste-based abuse. The court determined that the applicant was the main accused with a more culpable role than his co-accused, warranting denial of bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Omaram Bhikharam Jaat, finding a prima facie case against him under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and BNS 2023 for allegedly bringing a victim from Rajasthan to Maharashtra under bonded labor conditions, confining him, and subjecting him to caste-based abuse. The court determined that the applicant was the main accused with a more culpable role than his co-accused, warranting denial of bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts