Rakesh Atul Gaisamudre Alias Rokki Mahendra Hoke vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 53/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBI180001222026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
85/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
53/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Kaij
Judge
3-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
DHARUR POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rakesh Atul Gaisamudre Alias Rokki Mahendra Hoke
Adv. INGLE DADARAJE BALASAHEB
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
A BC Detail name and address mentioned in FIR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 31-03-2026 | Order |
| 30-03-2026 | Order |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Rakesh Gaisamudre, who is accused of serious offences including outraging the modesty of minor girls and violations of the POCSO Act. The judge found prima facie evidence against the accused based on the FIR allegations that he made inappropriate remarks to a minor girl, physically assaulted her and her sister with a stick and slaps, and dragged them by their clothing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Rakesh Gaisamudre, who is accused of serious offences including outraging the modesty of minor girls and violations of the POCSO Act. The judge found prima facie evidence against the accused based on the FIR allegations that he made inappropriate remarks to a minor girl, physically assaulted her and her sister with a stick and slaps, and dragged them by their clothing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts