Rakesh Atul Gaisamudre Alias Rokki Mahendra Hoke vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 53/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln.

CNR: MHBI180001222026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

85/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

53/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Additional Sessions Court Kaij

Judge

3-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

DHARUR POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rakesh Atul Gaisamudre Alias Rokki Mahendra Hoke

    Adv. INGLE DADARAJE BALASAHEB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

  2. 2.A BC Detail name and address mentioned in FIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Rakesh Gaisamudre, who is accused of serious offences including outraging the modesty of minor girls and violations of the POCSO Act. The judge found prima facie evidence against the accused based on the FIR allegations that he made inappropriate remarks to a minor girl, physically assaulted her and her sister with a stick and slaps, and dragged them by their clothing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 31-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  8. 31-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  9. 31-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  10. 31-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  11. 31-Mar-2026

    Order

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  12. 30-Mar-2026

    Order

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  13. 27-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  14. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  15. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  16. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  17. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  18. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  19. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  20. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  21. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  22. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  23. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  24. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  25. 02-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  26. 25-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  27. 23-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  28. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 53/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Rakesh Gaisamudre, who is accused of serious offences including outraging the modesty of minor girls and violations of the POCSO Act. The judge found prima facie evidence against the accused based on the FIR allegations that he made inappropriate remarks to a minor girl, physically assaulted her and her sister with a stick and slaps, and dragged them by their clothing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case