Shrikrushna alias Bablu Bibhishan Darade vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 52/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBI180001202026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
84/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
52/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Kaij
Judge
3-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
DHARUR POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shrikrushna alias Bablu Bibhishan Darade
Adv. Sudarshan Navnath Munde
Kishor Sandipan Phad
Adv. Sudarshan Navnath Munde
Santosh Jyotiram Choure
Adv. Sudarshan Navnath Munde
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order |
| 09-03-2026 | Order |
| 05-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 04-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge at Kaij rejected the anticipatory bail application of Shrikrushna (Bablu) Darade and others in a serious kidnapping case involving abduction, assault with weapons, wrongful confinement, and extortion threats. The court found prima facie evidence against the applicants based on victim and witness statements, noting that investigation remained incomplete and custodial interrogation was necessary for weapon recovery and further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge at Kaij rejected the anticipatory bail application of Shrikrushna (Bablu) Darade and others in a serious kidnapping case involving abduction, assault with weapons, wrongful confinement, and extortion threats. The court found prima facie evidence against the applicants based on victim and witness statements, noting that investigation remained incomplete and custodial interrogation was necessary for weapon recovery and further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts