STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Suryakant Asaram Athavale Advocate - Kale K.D. — 43/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI170001722025
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
91/2025
Filing Date
28-02-2025
Registration No
43/2025
Registration Date
28-02-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Wadwani
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC WADWANI
FIR Details
FIR Number
271
Police Station
POLICE STATION WADWANI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Suryakant Asaram Athavale Advocate - Kale K.D.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC WADWANI
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 28-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary This is a police witness examination document in an illegal liquor case from Vadavni Police Station, Beed district. The witness (a police officer) testified about a raid conducted on 25.10.2024 where approximately 35 liters of illicit country liquor was seized from the accused Suryakant Athavale's shed in Pimparkhed village. During cross-examination, the accused's counsel challenged the credibility of the investigation, claiming the raid was conducted hastily and questioning the proper procedure followed. The court accepted the post-hearing statement on 12.03.2026, with the examination concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary This is a police witness examination document in an illegal liquor case from Vadavni Police Station, Beed district. The witness (a police officer) testified about a raid conducted on 25.10.2024 where approximately 35 liters of illicit country liquor was seized from the accused Suryakant Athavale's shed in Pimparkhed village. During cross-examination, the accused's counsel challenged the credibility of the investigation, claiming the raid was conducted hastily and questioning the proper procedure followed. The court accepted the post-hearing statement on 12.03.2026, with the examination concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts