Sundar S/o Dhondiram Rathod vs Premdas S/o Manik Rathod — 19/2026
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI170001182026
e-Filing Number
08-03-2026
Filing Number
55/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
19/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Wadwani
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sundar S/o Dhondiram Rathod
Adv. Dattatray Janardhan chavan
-
2.Amar S/o Ramdas Rathod
Adv. Dattatray Janardhan chavan
-
3.Sharad S/o Mohan Rathod
Adv. Dattatray Janardhan chavan
-
4.Gorakh S/o Rumaji Rathod
Adv. Dattatray Janardhan chavan
-
5.Soma S/o Ambu Rathod
Adv. Dattatray Janardhan chavan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Premdas S/o Manik Rathod
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The National Lok-Adalat in Wadwani disposed of the suit between Sundar & Ors. v. Premdas & One Anr. (R.C.S. No.19/2026) on 14.03.2026 based on a compromise deed jointly filed by both parties, who amicably settled the dispute. The court directed that if the decree causes land fragmentation, Revenue/Consolidation Officers must apply the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947, and if registration is required, the implementing officer shall send it to the concerned authority; court fees were refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani
-
12-Mar-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 19/2026
Summary: The National Lok-Adalat in Wadwani disposed of the suit between Sundar & Ors. v. Premdas & One Anr. (R.C.S. No.19/2026) on 14.03.2026 based on a compromise deed jointly filed by both parties, who amicably settled the dispute. The court directed that if the decree causes land fragmentation, Revenue/Consolidation Officers must apply the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947, and if registration is required, the implementing officer shall send it to the concerned authority; court fees were refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts