STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Balu Shivaji Sonpasare Advocate - Ade T.R. — 15/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A452323,50450634. Status: Evidence Before Charge. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI170000842016
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
44/2016
Filing Date
25-02-2016
Registration No
15/2016
Registration Date
25-02-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Wadwani
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC WADWANI
FIR Details
FIR Number
122
Police Station
POLICE STATION WADWANI
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. Jadhav S.H.
Respondent(s)
Balu Shivaji Sonpasare Advocate - Ade T.R.
Kanchan Shivaji Sonpasare
Adv. Gaikwad U.G.
Abasaheb Janardhan Kakde
Adv. Gaikwad U.G.
Divashala Abasaheb Kakde
Adv. Gaikwad U.G.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC WADWANI
Evidence Before Charge
Evidence Before Charge
Evidence Before Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence Before Charge |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Before Charge |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence Before Charge |
| 05-01-2026 | Charge |
| 09-12-2025 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: The discharge application of accused Nos. 3 and 4 in a case under IPC Section 498A (dowry harassment) has been rejected. The court found prima facie evidence that accused No. 4 is the niece of the informant's husband and accused No. 3 is her husband, establishing the necessary familial relationship. Specific allegations of assault against the informant and her parents on 17.11.2015 were found sufficient to warrant trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The discharge application of accused Nos. 3 and 4 in a case under IPC Section 498A (dowry harassment) has been rejected. The court found prima facie evidence that accused No. 4 is the niece of the informant's husband and accused No. 3 is her husband, establishing the necessary familial relationship. Specific allegations of assault against the informant and her parents on 17.11.2015 were found sufficient to warrant trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts