ANSH SO ARUN KADAM UG SANGITA WO ARUN KADAM vs VAIJINATH S/O CHANDRSEN KADAM — 5/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 6. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE on 01st April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI170000342026
e-Filing Number
17-01-2026
Filing Number
16/2026
Filing Date
19-Jan-2026
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
19-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Wadwani
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANSH SO ARUN KADAM UG SANGITA WO ARUN KADAM
Adv. Adv. S. A. Lange
-
2.SANGITA W/O ARUN KADAM
Adv. Adv. S. A. Lange
Respondent(s)
-
1.VAIJINATH S/O CHANDRSEN KADAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Civil Judge disposed of the partition and separate possession suit between Ansh and Vaijanath by accepting a voluntary and legally valid compromise deed filed by both parties. The court recorded and verified the compromise deed, finding it to be genuine and made with the parties' informed consent, and accordingly closed the case under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani
-
23-Mar-2026
Steps_Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani
-
16-Mar-2026
Steps_Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani
-
14-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani
-
13-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani
-
12-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani
-
11-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani
-
21-Feb-2026
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani
-
19-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2026
The Civil Judge disposed of the partition and separate possession suit between Ansh and Vaijanath by accepting a voluntary and legally valid compromise deed filed by both parties. The court recorded and verified the compromise deed, finding it to be genuine and made with the parties' informed consent, and accordingly closed the case under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts