Shrimant S/o Marotrao Alias Marotirao Telgad vs Nil — 2/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI170000032026

e-Filing Number

05-01-2026

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Wadwani

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shrimant S/o Marotrao Alias Marotirao Telgad

    Adv. JADHAV VINAYAK KALYANRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed by the respondent, finding that the petitioner (Marathi Nalbhauz Telgaad) had validly raised objections to the respondent's counterclaim through proper legal procedures. The court rejected the respondent's arguments challenging the petition's maintainability and upheld the petitioner's right to pursue the matter through established court processes based on procedural compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Wadwani

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  11. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed by the respondent, finding that the petitioner (Marathi Nalbhauz Telgaad) had validly raised objections to the respondent's counterclaim through proper legal procedures. The court rejected the respondent's arguments challenging the petition's maintainability and upheld the petitioner's right to pursue the matter through established court processes based on procedural compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case