Sangita Popat Jadhav vs Kalpana Bhausaheb Pawal Advocate - Shaikh S.M. — 1431/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI160022132022
Filing Number
1763/2022
Filing Date
19-Nov-2022
Registration No
1431/2022
Registration Date
19-Nov-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sangita Popat Jadhav
Adv. Adv.K.P.Dongere
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kalpana Bhausaheb Pawal Advocate - Shaikh S.M.
-
2.Bhausaheb Dashrath Paval
Adv. Adv.D.J.Kothul
-
3.Nanda Rajendra Mengade
Adv. Adv.D.J.Kothul
-
4.Ranjana Ramnath Jadhav
Adv. Adv.D.J.Kothul
-
5.Mira Dashrath Paval
Adv. Adv.D.J.Kothul
-
6.Radhabai Dashrath Paval
Adv. Adv.D.J.Kothul
Case History
-
07-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
12-Mar-2026
Compliance
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
29-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
28-Nov-2025
Order on T.I.View PDF
Summary: The petition filed by Sangeeta against Kalpana and others seeking partition of ancestral joint family property (consisting of plots 88-89 in Mauze Arvi, Shirur Kasara, Beed district) and a temporary injunction was allowed. The court granted an interim order restraining defendants 1, 7-9 from transferring, selling, gifting, mortgaging, or creating third-party rights over the disputed property until final judgment, finding the petitioner has established a prima facie case, irreparable loss, and balance of convenience in her favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
31-Oct-2025
Compliance
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
19-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
19-Sep-2025
Compliance
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
28-Aug-2025
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
25-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
19-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
10-Apr-2025
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
04-Mar-2025
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
23-Jan-2025
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
28-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
24-Oct-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
20-Sep-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
27-Aug-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
23-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
18-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
26-Mar-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
13-Feb-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
13-Feb-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
16-Jan-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
12-Dec-2023
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
07-Nov-2023
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
05-Oct-2023
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
02-Sep-2023
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
16-Aug-2023
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
17-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
16-Jun-2023
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
06-May-2023
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
28-Apr-2023
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
27-Mar-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
27-Mar-2023
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
18-Mar-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
10-Mar-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
31-Jan-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
20-Dec-2022
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Shirur-K
-
19-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 1431/2022
Summary: The petition filed by Sangeeta against Kalpana and others seeking partition of ancestral joint family property (consisting of plots 88-89 in Mauze Arvi, Shirur Kasara, Beed district) and a temporary injunction was allowed. The court granted an interim order restraining defendants 1, 7-9 from transferring, selling, gifting, mortgaging, or creating third-party rights over the disputed property until final judgment, finding the petitioner has established a prima facie case, irreparable loss, and balance of convenience in her favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts