Suresh Haribhau Chavan vs Laxman Asaram Chavan — 544/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHBI160011102021

Evidence

Next Hearing

08th July 2026

Filing Number

785/2021

Filing Date

27-08-2021

Registration No

544/2021

Registration Date

27-08-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

Suresh Haribhau Chavan

Adv. Yele B.E.

Ram Pandurang Chavan

Rajendra Vitthal Chavan

Bandu Vitthal Chavan

Respondent(s)

Laxman Asaram Chavan

Vilas Asaram Chavan

Panchfula Asaram Chavan

Madhukar Vishwanath Chavan

Subhidrabai Pandurang Chavan

Adv. Pathan R.A.

Kamalbai Rohidas Jogdand

Adv. Pathan R.A.

Taramati Vitthal Chavan

Adv. Pathan R.A.

Chabubai Mohar Sherkar

Arunabai Shrimant Dandwate

Deelip Gangaram Chavan

Adv. Jaybhaye V.S.

Babu Dashrath Chavan

Adv. Jaybhaye V.S.

Ramesh Murlidhar Chavan

Adv. Jaybhaye V.S.

Kamalbai Damu Chavan

Adv. Jaybhaye V.S.

Vimalbai Ramrao Chavan

Adv. Jaybhaye V.S.

Damodar Dagdu Chavan

Adv. Jaybhaye V.S.

Babita Ramchandra Chavan

Adv. Jaybhaye V.S.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K

27-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

List of Witness

29-01-2026

Issues

15-12-2025

Issues

27-10-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

03-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application filed by Defendants 10-16 was allowed. The court set aside the "no written statement" and "no cross-examination" orders previously passed against them, permitting them to file their written statement and conduct cross-examination of plaintiff witnesses. Defendants 10-16 were directed to pay Rs. 1,000 as cost to the plaintiffs before the next date of hearing, failing which the application would be rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by Defendants 10-16 was allowed. The court set aside the "no written statement" and "no cross-examination" orders previously passed against them, permitting them to file their written statement and conduct cross-examination of plaintiff witnesses. Defendants 10-16 were directed to pay Rs. 1,000 as cost to the plaintiffs before the next date of hearing, failing which the application would be rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case