Anjali Satish Kedar U/g. Mother Plaintiff No. 4 vs Gahininath Shivram Kedar — 654/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI160010892022
Filing Number
853/2022
Filing Date
21-06-2022
Registration No
654/2022
Registration Date
21-06-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anjali Satish Kedar U/g. Mother Plaintiff No. 4
Adv. Nagargoje R.M.
Arti Satish Kedar U/g. Mother Plaintiff No. 3
Aradhya Satish Kedar U/g. Mother Plaintiff No. 4
Anita Satish Kedar
Respondent(s)
Gahininath Shivram Kedar
Rukhminbai Gahininath Kedar
Satish Gahininath Kedar
Suresh Gahininath Kedar
Meena Babu FUnde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Ex_Party Hearing
Ex_Party Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-01-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 25-11-2025 | Dismissal Order |
| 16-09-2025 | Ex_Party Hearing |
| 10-07-2025 | Ex_Party Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Civil Judge dismissed Anjali's partition and separate possession suit in default for want of evidence. The court found that the plaintiffs had been absent for an extended period, failed to take effective steps to proceed despite the case being pending for approximately four years, and did not file any adjournment application on the date of hearing. All interim relief granted was vacated, and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Civil Judge dismissed Anjali's partition and separate possession suit in default for want of evidence. The court found that the plaintiffs had been absent for an extended period, failed to take effective steps to proceed despite the case being pending for approximately four years, and did not file any adjournment application on the date of hearing. All interim relief granted was vacated, and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts