Samadhan Babu Shingade vs Natha Tatyaba Shingade — 575/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHBI160009482023

Case disposed

Filing Number

702/2023

Filing Date

29-04-2023

Registration No

575/2023

Registration Date

29-04-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

Samadhan Babu Shingade

Adv. Kothule H.S.

Anil Ranganath Shingade

Vaijinath Ranganath Shingade

Respondent(s)

Natha Tatyaba Shingade

Indrabai Natha Shingade

Madhukar Natha Shingade

Atmaram Natha Shingade

Vithal Madhukar Shingade

Gangaram Natha Shingade

Sarjerao Natha Shingade

Balasaheb Natha Shingade

Bhagwat Suryabhan Kolekar

Damodar Bhagwat Kolekar

Jayabai Devara Bankar

Shesharao Chandrakant Lokhande

Bhagubai Haribhau Shingade

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K

12-03-2026

Disposed

08-01-2026

Dismissal Order

10-11-2025

Dismissal Order

21-08-2025

Dismissal Order

26-06-2025

Dismissal Order

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Civil Judge dismissed a partition and separate possession suit filed by Samadhan against Natha and others in default for want of evidence. The court found that the plaintiffs had abandoned the case by remaining absent for prolonged periods, failing to present evidence, and showing no interest in proceeding despite the case pending for approximately three years. All interim reliefs granted were vacated, and the proceedings were closed without any order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Civil Judge dismissed a partition and separate possession suit filed by Samadhan against Natha and others in default for want of evidence. The court found that the plaintiffs had abandoned the case by remaining absent for prolonged periods, failing to present evidence, and showing no interest in proceeding despite the case pending for approximately three years. All interim reliefs granted were vacated, and the proceedings were closed without any order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case