Samadhan Babu Shingade vs Natha Tatyaba Shingade — 575/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI160009482023
Filing Number
702/2023
Filing Date
29-04-2023
Registration No
575/2023
Registration Date
29-04-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Samadhan Babu Shingade
Adv. Kothule H.S.
Anil Ranganath Shingade
Vaijinath Ranganath Shingade
Respondent(s)
Natha Tatyaba Shingade
Indrabai Natha Shingade
Madhukar Natha Shingade
Atmaram Natha Shingade
Vithal Madhukar Shingade
Gangaram Natha Shingade
Sarjerao Natha Shingade
Balasaheb Natha Shingade
Bhagwat Suryabhan Kolekar
Damodar Bhagwat Kolekar
Jayabai Devara Bankar
Shesharao Chandrakant Lokhande
Bhagubai Haribhau Shingade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-01-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 10-11-2025 | Dismissal Order |
| 21-08-2025 | Dismissal Order |
| 26-06-2025 | Dismissal Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Civil Judge dismissed a partition and separate possession suit filed by Samadhan against Natha and others in default for want of evidence. The court found that the plaintiffs had abandoned the case by remaining absent for prolonged periods, failing to present evidence, and showing no interest in proceeding despite the case pending for approximately three years. All interim reliefs granted were vacated, and the proceedings were closed without any order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Civil Judge dismissed a partition and separate possession suit filed by Samadhan against Natha and others in default for want of evidence. The court found that the plaintiffs had abandoned the case by remaining absent for prolonged periods, failing to present evidence, and showing no interest in proceeding despite the case pending for approximately three years. All interim reliefs granted were vacated, and the proceedings were closed without any order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts