Kadubai Namdev Sanap vs Arjun Laxman Dhakne — 320/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI160006122018
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
383/2018
Filing Date
18-06-2018
Registration No
320/2018
Registration Date
18-06-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kadubai Namdev Sanap
Adv. Jaybhay B.B.
Respondent(s)
Arjun Laxman Dhakne
bhanudas laxman dhakne
bhimrao laxman dhakne
Saraswati mithu Dhakne
Dnyandev Mithu Dhakne
Dattatraya mithu Dhakne
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K
Awaiting Summons
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 06-04-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 12-03-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 20-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition was allowed. The court ordered that defendants 7-9 (Bharat Mahadev Taambure, Harinent Tulshiram Dhakne, and Balasaheb Tulshiram Dhakne) be impleaded as necessary parties to the land partition suit, as they acquired ownership of the disputed survey property through subsequent sales during the pendency of the case. The court also directed amendment of the suit to include proper details of these transactions and consolidation with a related succession case filed by defendant 1's heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition was allowed. The court ordered that defendants 7-9 (Bharat Mahadev Taambure, Harinent Tulshiram Dhakne, and Balasaheb Tulshiram Dhakne) be impleaded as necessary parties to the land partition suit, as they acquired ownership of the disputed survey property through subsequent sales during the pendency of the case. The court also directed amendment of the suit to include proper details of these transactions and consolidation with a related succession case filed by defendant 1's heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts