Dadasaheb Uttam Dhangude vs Revannath Dnyanoba Dhangude — 261/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHBI160004302023

Case disposed

Filing Number

311/2023

Filing Date

14-02-2023

Registration No

261/2023

Registration Date

14-02-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Dadasaheb Uttam Dhangude

Adv. Dongre U.M.

Respondent(s)

Revannath Dnyanoba Dhangude

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K

12-03-2026

Disposed

02-01-2026

Steps_Unready

10-10-2025

Steps_Unready

14-07-2025

Steps_Unready

24-04-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary Dadasaheb v. Revanath (R.C.S. No. 261/2023) The Civil Judge dismissed the suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction in default for want of steps. The court found that the plaintiff failed to supply copies of the plaint and documents for service of summons on the defendant since filing in 2023, remained absent from court proceedings, and explicitly instructed his advocate to inform the court of his lack of interest in proceeding further. All interim relief granted was vacated, and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Dadasaheb v. Revanath (R.C.S. No. 261/2023) The Civil Judge dismissed the suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction in default for want of steps. The court found that the plaintiff failed to supply copies of the plaint and documents for service of summons on the defendant since filing in 2023, remained absent from court proceedings, and explicitly instructed his advocate to inform the court of his lack of interest in proceeding further. All interim relief granted was vacated, and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case