Dadasaheb Uttam Dhangude vs Revannath Dnyanoba Dhangude — 261/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI160004302023
Filing Number
311/2023
Filing Date
14-02-2023
Registration No
261/2023
Registration Date
14-02-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dadasaheb Uttam Dhangude
Adv. Dongre U.M.
Respondent(s)
Revannath Dnyanoba Dhangude
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K
Disposed
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-01-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 10-10-2025 | Steps_Unready |
| 14-07-2025 | Steps_Unready |
| 24-04-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Dadasaheb v. Revanath (R.C.S. No. 261/2023) The Civil Judge dismissed the suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction in default for want of steps. The court found that the plaintiff failed to supply copies of the plaint and documents for service of summons on the defendant since filing in 2023, remained absent from court proceedings, and explicitly instructed his advocate to inform the court of his lack of interest in proceeding further. All interim relief granted was vacated, and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Dadasaheb v. Revanath (R.C.S. No. 261/2023) The Civil Judge dismissed the suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction in default for want of steps. The court found that the plaintiff failed to supply copies of the plaint and documents for service of summons on the defendant since filing in 2023, remained absent from court proceedings, and explicitly instructed his advocate to inform the court of his lack of interest in proceeding further. All interim relief granted was vacated, and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts