STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Ramdas Laxman Kale Advocate - Jaybhay B.B. — 8/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI160001082017
Filing Number
17/2017
Filing Date
16-01-2017
Registration No
8/2017
Registration Date
16-01-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
122
Police Station
POLICE STATION SHIRUR-K
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. Mane S.T.
Respondent(s)
Ramdas Laxman Kale Advocate - Jaybhay B.B.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-12-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary On March 12, 2026, the First Class Judicial Magistrate at Shirur Kasara (Beed District) acquitted defendant Ramdas Lakshman Kale of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 324, 323, 504, and 506. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused intentionally caused injuries to the complainant with a whip, despite testimony from the complainant and witnesses; credibility issues and inconsistencies in witness statements created sufficient doubt favoring the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary On March 12, 2026, the First Class Judicial Magistrate at Shirur Kasara (Beed District) acquitted defendant Ramdas Lakshman Kale of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 324, 323, 504, and 506. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused intentionally caused injuries to the complainant with a whip, despite testimony from the complainant and witnesses; credibility issues and inconsistencies in witness statements created sufficient doubt favoring the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts