Rahibai Wo Mahadev Misal vs Nil — 16/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 25th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI160000442026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-01-2026

Filing Number

39/2026

Filing Date

09-01-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

09-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Rahibai Wo Mahadev Misal

Adv. Pramod Bhagwanrao Misal

Respondent(s)

Nil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC SHIRUR-K

25-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

12-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

05-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

26-02-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The civil court at Shirud approved the petitioner's application under the Bombay Regulation Act 1827 to obtain a Heirship Certificate, establishing that the petitioner is the sole legitimate heir of the deceased Prayagabai Bhimrao Vitthal Sanap (who died on 09/12/2025). The court granted the certificate to enable the petitioner to access government and non-government benefits, finding the petitioner's evidence (affidavit and death certificate) sufficient to prove heirship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The civil court at Shirud approved the petitioner's application under the Bombay Regulation Act 1827 to obtain a Heirship Certificate, establishing that the petitioner is the sole legitimate heir of the deceased Prayagabai Bhimrao Vitthal Sanap (who died on 09/12/2025). The court granted the certificate to enable the petitioner to access government and non-government benefits, finding the petitioner's evidence (affidavit and death certificate) sufficient to prove heirship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shirur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case