Pandurag Sandipan Bhosale vs Nil — 426/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th May 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHBI150016622025
e-Filing Number
24-11-2025
Filing Number
923/2025
Filing Date
25-11-2025
Registration No
426/2025
Registration Date
25-11-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patoda
Judge
2-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandurag Sandipan Bhosale
Adv. Ghumre S. N.
Vinod S/o Sandipan Bhosale
Mina W/o Balasaheb Ware
Shobha W/o Ravindra Ware
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Disposed
Arguments
Proclomation
Proclomation
Proclomation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Proclomation |
| 10-02-2026 | Proclomation |
| 02-02-2026 | Proclomation |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court approved the petition for a succession certificate under the Bombay Regulation VIII, 1827, recognizing the four applicants as the legal heirs of the deceased Sandeepan Ranjit Bhosle. The court found that the applicants (two sons and two married daughters) satisfied all legal requirements under Hindu succession law, as no objections were filed after public notice, and documentary evidence supported their claim. The court directed the issuance of the succession certificate to the applicants after payment of prescribed fees and stamp duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court approved the petition for a succession certificate under the Bombay Regulation VIII, 1827, recognizing the four applicants as the legal heirs of the deceased Sandeepan Ranjit Bhosle. The court found that the applicants (two sons and two married daughters) satisfied all legal requirements under Hindu succession law, as no objections were filed after public notice, and documentary evidence supported their claim. The court directed the issuance of the succession certificate to the applicants after payment of prescribed fees and stamp duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts