Sayyed Riyajuddin Sayyed Kamaloddin vs Abdul Majjid Abdul Gafur Advocate - Jadhav N.G. — 1600408/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitforPerpetualInjunction. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI150010082014
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
Filing Number
1600478/2014
Filing Date
16-10-2014
Registration No
1600408/2014
Registration Date
16-10-2014
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patoda
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sayyed Riyajuddin Sayyed Kamaloddin
Adv. Dhase Rajan P.
Respondent(s)
Abdul Majjid Abdul Gafur Advocate - Jadhav N.G.
Vitthal Baburao Sanap
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 02-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 12-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 15-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, permitting him to add claims for mandatory injunction and possession regarding encroachment committed by the defendant during the suit's pendency. The amendment was permitted subject to the plaintiff paying ₹1,000 in costs to the defendants and submitting the amended plaint by the next date, with automatic rejection of the application if these conditions are not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, permitting him to add claims for mandatory injunction and possession regarding encroachment committed by the defendant during the suit's pendency. The amendment was permitted subject to the plaintiff paying ₹1,000 in costs to the defendants and submitting the amended plaint by the next date, with automatic rejection of the application if these conditions are not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts