Kaushalyabai Babsaheb Doke vs Murlidhar Gangaram Pawar Advocate - Pawar V.A. — 230/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI150009732021
Next Hearing
23rd July 2026
Filing Number
522/2021
Filing Date
08-09-2021
Registration No
230/2021
Registration Date
08-09-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patoda
Judge
2-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kaushalyabai Babsaheb Doke
Adv. Nagargoje S.R.
Respondent(s)
Murlidhar Gangaram Pawar Advocate - Pawar V.A.
Parubai Dada Pawar
Dattatray Dada Pawar
Jijabai Harichandra Navsare
Dwarkabai Navnath Bedare
Kailas Maroti Bhavar
Prabhu Maroti Bhavar
Pandurang Maroti Bhavar
Mandabai Dinkar Jagadale
Shakubai Maroti Gule
Nanasaheb Bhanudas Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 22-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 08-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 29-10-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 12-09-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court dismissed the defendant No. 12's petition and allowed the plaintiff's application to file written submissions. The court accepted the plaintiff's written submissions and set aside the order dated 08.06.2022 that had initiated fresh proceedings against defendant No. 12, recognizing that the delay in filing was justified due to unavailable crucial documents and the defendant's spouse's death. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 100/- on the defendant with directions to pay the plaintiff, after which the defendant's written submission would be accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court dismissed the defendant No. 12's petition and allowed the plaintiff's application to file written submissions. The court accepted the plaintiff's written submissions and set aside the order dated 08.06.2022 that had initiated fresh proceedings against defendant No. 12, recognizing that the delay in filing was justified due to unavailable crucial documents and the defendant's spouse's death. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 100/- on the defendant with directions to pay the plaintiff, after which the defendant's written submission would be accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts