STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Dnyandev Ramhari Chaure Advocate - Aute R.G. — 86/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI150005912024
Filing Number
590/2024
Filing Date
06-05-2024
Registration No
86/2024
Registration Date
06-05-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patoda
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
108
Police Station
State Excise Beed
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Dnyandev Ramhari Chaure Advocate - Aute R.G.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 01-10-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court stopped the criminal proceedings against Dnyandev Ramhari Chaure under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and released him for the offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that despite multiple witness summons, the prosecution failed to produce witnesses and the Forensic Analyst (CA) report was not filed, rendering continued proceedings an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court stopped the criminal proceedings against Dnyandev Ramhari Chaure under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and released him for the offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that despite multiple witness summons, the prosecution failed to produce witnesses and the Forensic Analyst (CA) report was not filed, rendering continued proceedings an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts