Sopan Namdeo Garje vs Muktaji Tatya Garje 22 others Advocate - Nagargoje S.R. — 1600125/2008
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitforSeparationPossession. Status: Amended W.S.. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI150003962008
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
1600125/2008
Filing Date
09-06-2008
Registration No
1600125/2008
Registration Date
09-06-2008
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patoda
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sopan Namdeo Garje
Adv. Shaikh S.M.
Respondent(s)
Muktaji Tatya Garje 22 others Advocate - Nagargoje S.R.
Mukatabai Manohar Garje
Pramila Balasaheb Garje
Manohar Namdeo Garje
Balasaheb Namdeo Garje(Legal Heir)
Samindra Tatya Garje
Shivaji Tatya Garje
Lochanabai Manik Nagargoje
Indubai Sopan Rakh
Popat Shridhar Nagargoje
Jayram Shridhar Nagargoje
Suresh Shridhar Nagargoje
Fulabai Keshav Garje
Vilas Keshav Garje
Chhagan Keshav Garje
Vikram Keshav Garje
Indubai Babasaheb Garje
Vitthal Babasaheb Garje
Ramesh Babasaheb Garje
Maina Babasaheb Garje
Haribai Namdeo Garje
Keshar Sambhu Jaybhaye
Zumbar Sonba Sanap
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Amended W.S.
Amended W.S.
Amended W.S.
Amended W.S.
Amended W.S.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Amended W.S. |
| 23-04-2026 | Amended W.S. |
| 12-03-2026 | Amended W.S. |
| 05-02-2026 | Amended W.S. |
| 15-01-2026 | Amended W.S. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Suit No. 125/08 - Property Partition Case (Patoda, District Beed) The court allowed the plaintiff's suit for partition of inherited joint Hindu property. The court declared that the plaintiff (Sopan Namedev Garje) is entitled to a 1/20th share of the ancestral property as a coparcener with other defendants. The court directed that the ancestral property be divided among all legal heirs according to their respective shares, with plaintiff receiving 1/20th share, defendants 5 and 21 each receiving 1/20th, defendants 2, 4-c, and 4-d each receiving 1/60th, and other defendants receiving proportional shares ranging from 1/10th to 1/122nd based on their status as male/female members and generation within the joint family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Suit No. 125/08 - Property Partition Case (Patoda, District Beed) The court allowed the plaintiff's suit for partition of inherited joint Hindu property. The court declared that the plaintiff (Sopan Namedev Garje) is entitled to a 1/20th share of the ancestral property as a coparcener with other defendants. The court directed that the ancestral property be divided among all legal heirs according to their respective shares, with plaintiff receiving 1/20th share, defendants 5 and 21 each receiving 1/20th, defendants 2, 4-c, and 4-d each receiving 1/60th, and other defendants receiving proportional shares ranging from 1/10th to 1/122nd based on their status as male/female members and generation within the joint family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts