Kailas S/o Vaijinath Chavan vs State Through Police Inspector — 27/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI150002952026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

124/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

27/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patoda

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

Police Station

Police Station Patoda.

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Kailas S/o Vaijinath Chavan

Adv. Kankariya C.S.

Respondent(s)

State Through Police Inspector

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.

12-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted the petitioner's application to recover an Oppo A31 mobile phone (seized in FIR 321/2025 at Patoda Police Station under the Mumbai Gambling Act) by ordering its return upon furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 and compliance with specified conditions, including maintaining the phone's physical condition, producing it in court when required, and not using it in any other criminal matter. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent that seized items should not remain in police custody beyond 15 days to one month to prevent deterioration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petitioner's application to recover an Oppo A31 mobile phone (seized in FIR 321/2025 at Patoda Police Station under the Mumbai Gambling Act) by ordering its return upon furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 and compliance with specified conditions, including maintaining the phone's physical condition, producing it in court when required, and not using it in any other criminal matter. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent that seized items should not remain in police custody beyond 15 days to one month to prevent deterioration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patoda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case