Kailas S/o Vaijinath Chavan vs State Through Police Inspector — 27/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHBI150002952026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
124/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
27/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patoda
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
Police Station
Police Station Patoda.
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kailas S/o Vaijinath Chavan
Adv. Kankariya C.S.
Respondent(s)
State Through Police Inspector
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Disposed
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted the petitioner's application to recover an Oppo A31 mobile phone (seized in FIR 321/2025 at Patoda Police Station under the Mumbai Gambling Act) by ordering its return upon furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 and compliance with specified conditions, including maintaining the phone's physical condition, producing it in court when required, and not using it in any other criminal matter. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent that seized items should not remain in police custody beyond 15 days to one month to prevent deterioration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted the petitioner's application to recover an Oppo A31 mobile phone (seized in FIR 321/2025 at Patoda Police Station under the Mumbai Gambling Act) by ordering its return upon furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 and compliance with specified conditions, including maintaining the phone's physical condition, producing it in court when required, and not using it in any other criminal matter. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent that seized items should not remain in police custody beyond 15 days to one month to prevent deterioration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts