Krishannath Kashinath Kulkarni vs Jalindar Gangaram Jare Advocate - Vaidya A.S. — 1600083/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitforDeclaratationofOwnershipandPerpetualInjunction. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI150002372014
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
1600097/2014
Filing Date
01-03-2014
Registration No
1600083/2014
Registration Date
03-03-2014
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patoda
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krishannath Kashinath Kulkarni
Adv. Dhase Rajan P.
Usha Dharnidhar Kulkarni
Madhuri Mukund Dev
Narendra Dharnidhar Kulkarni
Shrikant Dharnidhar Kulkarni
Shubhda Shamrao Kulkarni
Hrishikesh Shamrao Kulkarni
Deepali Sachin Kulkarni
Respondent(s)
Jalindar Gangaram Jare Advocate - Vaidya A.S.
Shahadev Gangaram Jare
Parmeshwar Kishan Jare
Narayan Kishan Jare
Vitthal Parmeshwar Jare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed two appeals (Petitions 44 and 46) and set aside the earlier orders passed in favor of the plaintiff, directing that the case proceedings be continued against the defendants. The court found that defendants 1-4 repeatedly failed to submit their affidavits and documents despite having knowledge of court proceedings and multiple opportunities, justifying dismissal of their appeals due to lack of diligence and cooperation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed two appeals (Petitions 44 and 46) and set aside the earlier orders passed in favor of the plaintiff, directing that the case proceedings be continued against the defendants. The court found that defendants 1-4 repeatedly failed to submit their affidavits and documents despite having knowledge of court proceedings and multiple opportunities, justifying dismissal of their appeals due to lack of diligence and cooperation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts