STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Vilas Trimbak Sanap Advocate - Doke N.S. — 37/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHBI150001822024

Case disposed

Filing Number

179/2024

Filing Date

08-02-2024

Registration No

37/2024

Registration Date

08-02-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patoda

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Vilas Trimbak Sanap Advocate - Doke N.S.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.

07-05-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

12-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

26-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

22-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Paithan acquitted accused Vilas Trimbak Sanap under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the charges of illegal possession of foreign liquor for sale. The court observed critical evidentiary gaps, including the absence of chemical analysis reports, incomplete witness testimony (particularly the second panch witness), and lack of proper documentation establishing the seized material's nature, resulting in a reasonable doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Paithan acquitted accused Vilas Trimbak Sanap under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the charges of illegal possession of foreign liquor for sale. The court observed critical evidentiary gaps, including the absence of chemical analysis reports, incomplete witness testimony (particularly the second panch witness), and lack of proper documentation establishing the seized material's nature, resulting in a reasonable doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patoda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case