STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Vilas Trimbak Sanap Advocate - Doke N.S. — 37/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI150001822024
Filing Number
179/2024
Filing Date
08-02-2024
Registration No
37/2024
Registration Date
08-02-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patoda
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vilas Trimbak Sanap Advocate - Doke N.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATODA.
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Paithan acquitted accused Vilas Trimbak Sanap under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the charges of illegal possession of foreign liquor for sale. The court observed critical evidentiary gaps, including the absence of chemical analysis reports, incomplete witness testimony (particularly the second panch witness), and lack of proper documentation establishing the seized material's nature, resulting in a reasonable doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Paithan acquitted accused Vilas Trimbak Sanap under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the charges of illegal possession of foreign liquor for sale. The court observed critical evidentiary gaps, including the absence of chemical analysis reports, incomplete witness testimony (particularly the second panch witness), and lack of proper documentation establishing the seized material's nature, resulting in a reasonable doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts