THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Yuraj Balbhim Dhumal — 807/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHBI140024392025

Filing Number

1515/2025

Filing Date

22-Dec-2025

Registration No

807/2025

Registration Date

22-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Ashti

Judge

1-Joint JMFC Ashti

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

Excise Department

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yuraj Balbhim Dhumal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ashti, stopped proceedings against Yuvraj Balbhim Dhumal under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and released the accused due to lack of progress in the case—specifically, the investigating officer failed to file the Chargesheet/Cognizance (CA) report and the accused's presence was never secured. The confiscated liquor bottles were ordered to be sent to the Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    Joint JMFC Ashti

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint JMFC Ashti

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 807/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ashti, stopped proceedings against Yuvraj Balbhim Dhumal under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and released the accused due to lack of progress in the case—specifically, the investigating officer failed to file the Chargesheet/Cognizance (CA) report and the accused's presence was never secured. The confiscated liquor bottles were ordered to be sent to the Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case