THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Prakash Shankar Ghule and othr - 3 Advocate - Shekde V.H. — 174/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,354,323,504,506,427,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI140017952019
Filing Number
929/2019
Filing Date
19-09-2019
Registration No
174/2019
Registration Date
19-09-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Ashti
Judge
1-JOINT JMFC ASHTI
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0194
Police Station
Ambhora Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent(s)
Prakash Shankar Ghule and othr - 3 Advocate - Shekde V.H.
Parubai Shankar Ghule
Dharmanath Prabhakar Shirsath
Vikas Shankar Ghule
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JOINT JMFC ASHTI
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all four accused (Prakash Shankar Ghule, Parubai Shankar Ghule, Dharmanath Prabhakar Shirsat, and Nikash Shankar Ghule) of charges under IPC Sections 354, 452, 323, 427, 504, and 506 with Section 34. The judge found that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony was contradictory and unsupported by credible evidence or proper documentation. The court noted insufficient material evidence to prove the alleged assault and house invasion against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all four accused (Prakash Shankar Ghule, Parubai Shankar Ghule, Dharmanath Prabhakar Shirsat, and Nikash Shankar Ghule) of charges under IPC Sections 354, 452, 323, 427, 504, and 506 with Section 34. The judge found that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony was contradictory and unsupported by credible evidence or proper documentation. The court noted insufficient material evidence to prove the alleged assault and house invasion against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts