THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Balasaheb Appa Madane — 245/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI140016332024
Filing Number
820/2024
Filing Date
20-09-2024
Registration No
245/2024
Registration Date
20-09-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Ashti
Judge
4-3rd JMFC ASHTI.
Decision Date
12th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
527
Police Station
Ashti Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Balasaheb Appa Madane
Rupali Balasaheb Madane
Tushar Balasaheb Madne
Appa Babu Madne
Sindhubai Appa Madne
Sanjay Appa Madne
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd JMFC ASHTI.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Ashi, Beed district (judgment dated 12/05/2026) acquitted all six defendants under IPC Sections 324, 323, 504, and 506 (with Section 34), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the charges of assault with dangerous weapons (stone and iron shovel) beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant inconsistencies in witness testimony and concerns about the credibility of complainants' statements regarding personal grievances related to property disputes and prior criminal cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Ashi, Beed district (judgment dated 12/05/2026) acquitted all six defendants under IPC Sections 324, 323, 504, and 506 (with Section 34), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the charges of assault with dangerous weapons (stone and iron shovel) beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant inconsistencies in witness testimony and concerns about the credibility of complainants' statements regarding personal grievances related to property disputes and prior criminal cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts