THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Rajendra Panhalal Madne — 230/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI140015812024
Filing Number
792/2024
Filing Date
10-09-2024
Registration No
230/2024
Registration Date
10-09-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Ashti
Judge
4-3rd JMFC ASHTI.
Decision Date
12th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
524
Police Station
Ashti Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Panhalal Madne
Vandana Rajendra Madne
Panhalal Babu Madne
Mandabai Panhalal Madne
Vilas Sonaji Madne
Shantilal Sonaji Madne
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd JMFC ASHTI.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Ashi First Class Court acquitted all six accused (Rajendra Panhalal Madhe, Vandana Rajendra Madhe, Panhalal Babu Madhe, Mandabai Panhalal Madhe, Vilas Sonaji Madhe, and Shantilal Sonaji Madhe) on May 12, 2026, under IPC sections 143, 147, 324, 504, 506, and 149 due to insufficient evidence. The court found contradictions and inconsistencies in the prosecution witnesses' testimonies that created reasonable doubt, ruling the allegations of unlawful assembly, rioting, and causing injuries were not proven beyond doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Ashi First Class Court acquitted all six accused (Rajendra Panhalal Madhe, Vandana Rajendra Madhe, Panhalal Babu Madhe, Mandabai Panhalal Madhe, Vilas Sonaji Madhe, and Shantilal Sonaji Madhe) on May 12, 2026, under IPC sections 143, 147, 324, 504, 506, and 149 due to insufficient evidence. The court found contradictions and inconsistencies in the prosecution witnesses' testimonies that created reasonable doubt, ruling the allegations of unlawful assembly, rioting, and causing injuries were not proven beyond doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts