Chintan Namdev Yadav vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 49/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI140004102026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

302/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

49/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Ashti

Judge

4-3rd JMFC Ashti.

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chintan Namdev Yadav

    Adv. SHAIKH RYAJ YASIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary In Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 49/2026, the 3rd Judicial Magistrate at Ashti, Beed District, disposed of the application filed by Chintan Namdev Yadav against the State of Maharashtra as withdrawn. The applicant, through his advocate, filed a withdrawal petition (pursis) stating he did not wish to proceed with the matter, which was accepted by the court after being read and explained to him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd JMFC Ashti.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    3rd JMFC Ashti.

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    3rd JMFC Ashti.

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 49/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 49/2026, the 3rd Judicial Magistrate at Ashti, Beed District, disposed of the application filed by Chintan Namdev Yadav against the State of Maharashtra as withdrawn. The applicant, through his advocate, filed a withdrawal petition (pursis) stating he did not wish to proceed with the matter, which was accepted by the court after being read and explained to him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case