Sarjerao Dnyandeo Golhar vs TAPASI AMALDAR AMALNER — 44/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 27th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHBI140003752026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
267/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
44/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Ashti
Judge
1-Joint JMFC Ashti
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sarjerao Dnyandeo Golhar
Adv. Adv N E Shekade
Respondent(s)
-
1.TAPASI AMALDAR AMALNER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court allowed the application of Sarjerao Dnyandeo Golhar for interim custody of Rs. 30,000 seized by Cyber Cell in a cyber fraud case, citing Supreme Court precedent on release of seized property. The applicant was directed to execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and the investigating officer must conduct detailed panchnama with photographs before releasing the amount, following proper verification and identification procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
Joint JMFC Ashti
-
22-Apr-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Joint JMFC Ashti
-
06-Apr-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Joint JMFC Ashti
-
12-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Joint JMFC Ashti
-
06-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Joint JMFC Ashti
-
02-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Joint JMFC Ashti
-
26-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Joint JMFC Ashti
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 44/2026
Summary: The court allowed the application of Sarjerao Dnyandeo Golhar for interim custody of Rs. 30,000 seized by Cyber Cell in a cyber fraud case, citing Supreme Court precedent on release of seized property. The applicant was directed to execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and the investigating officer must conduct detailed panchnama with photographs before releasing the amount, following proper verification and identification procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts