THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Rupesh Janardhan Salve — 124/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(f)(e). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHBI140002852025

Filing Number

215/2025

Filing Date

15-Feb-2025

Registration No

124/2025

Registration Date

15-Feb-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Ashti

Judge

3-2nd JMFC Ashti.

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

505

Police Station

Ashti Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(f)(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rupesh Janardhan Salve

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused prosecuted under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC, finding that without the Chemical Analyst's report, there was insufficient evidence to establish possession of contraband. Seized materials were ordered to be sent to the Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd JMFC Ashti.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    2nd JMFC Ashti.

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  6. 18-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  7. 29-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  8. 04-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  9. 16-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  10. 25-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  11. 17-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 15-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 124/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused prosecuted under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC, finding that without the Chemical Analyst's report, there was insufficient evidence to establish possession of contraband. Seized materials were ordered to be sent to the Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case