THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Anil Laxman Garud Advocate - Nimbalkar V.P. — 5/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHBI140000492018

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Next Hearing

25th May 2026

Filing Number

35/2018

Filing Date

05-01-2018

Registration No

5/2018

Registration Date

05-01-2018

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Ashti

Judge

4-3rd JMFC ASHTI.

FIR Details

FIR Number

223

Police Station

Ambhora Police Station

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 324,323,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Adv. APP Jt.

Respondent(s)

Anil Laxman Garud Advocate - Nimbalkar V.P.

Abasaheb Bhausaheb Gade

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd JMFC ASHTI.

16-05-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

15-05-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

11-05-2026

Arguments

28-04-2026

Arguments

20-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

14-10-2025
Evidence
13-11-2025
Evidence
10-12-2025
Evidence
12-03-2026
Evidence
15-05-2026
Evidence

Summary: The court dismissed the case and acquitted the two accused persons (Criminals Case No. 5/2018, Aasti Court). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence against the accused, noting critical deficiencies including delayed complaint filing, inconsistent witness statements limited to complainant's family members, lack of independent corroboration, and procedural irregularities in evidence collection. The judgment was delivered on 11.05.2026 by the First Class Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed the case and acquitted the two accused persons (Criminals Case No. 5/2018, Aasti Court). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence against the accused, noting critical deficiencies including delayed complaint filing, inconsistent witness statements limited to complainant's family members, lack of independent corroboration, and procedural irregularities in evidence collection. The judgment was delivered on 11.05.2026 by the First Class Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Ashti All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case