Jaishree Bharat Gaikwad vs State of Maharashtra - Rural Police Station Parli V. — 102/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHBI130004852026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
326/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
102/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parli
Judge
3-CJJD AND JMFC PARLI VAIJNATH
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
0012
Police Station
Rural Police Station Parli V
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jaishree Bharat Gaikwad
Adv. UJGARE DEELIP SAMBHAJI
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra - Rural Police Station Parli V.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-CJJD AND JMFC PARLI VAIJNATH
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court allowed Jaishri Gaikwad's application for release of a seized VIVO mobile phone, finding that the applicant proved ownership through bill, Aadhar card, and FIR documents, with no sufficient reason to detain it. The court ordered release of the mobile subject to photographing, preparing a panchnama, and the applicant executing a ₹16,000 indemnity bond with surety, stipulating the device cannot be sold or disposed of until the criminal case concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed Jaishri Gaikwad's application for release of a seized VIVO mobile phone, finding that the applicant proved ownership through bill, Aadhar card, and FIR documents, with no sufficient reason to detain it. The court ordered release of the mobile subject to photographing, preparing a panchnama, and the applicant executing a ₹16,000 indemnity bond with surety, stipulating the device cannot be sold or disposed of until the criminal case concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts