Ganesh Rambhau Munde vs State of Maharashtra - Rural Police Station Parli V. — 101/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI130004842026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

325/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

101/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parli

Judge

2-Joint Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0044

Police Station

Rural Police Station Parli V

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ganesh Rambhau Munde

    Adv. PHAD PRAVIN VASANTRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra - Rural Police Station Parli V.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed Ganesh Munde's application for temporary custody of his seized Vivo V20 mobile phone, finding insufficient reason to detain it and that the applicant established ownership through FIR, Aadhaar card, and purchase receipt. The court directed the Investigation Officer to photograph the phone, prepare a Panchanama, and release it to the applicant upon execution of a ₹13,000 indemnity bond with conditions that the phone not be sold or disposed of and be produced as directed until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    Joint Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Joint Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Ganesh Munde's application for temporary custody of his seized Vivo V20 mobile phone, finding insufficient reason to detain it and that the applicant established ownership through FIR, Aadhaar card, and purchase receipt. The court directed the Investigation Officer to photograph the phone, prepare a Panchanama, and release it to the applicant upon execution of a ₹13,000 indemnity bond with conditions that the phone not be sold or disposed of and be produced as directed until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case