Ganesh Rambhau Munde vs State of Maharashtra - Rural Police Station Parli V. — 101/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHBI130004842026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
325/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
101/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parli
Judge
2-JOINT CJJD AND JMFC PARLI VAIJNATH
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
0044
Police Station
Rural Police Station Parli V
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh Rambhau Munde
Adv. PHAD PRAVIN VASANTRAO
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra - Rural Police Station Parli V.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JOINT CJJD AND JMFC PARLI VAIJNATH
Disposed
Order
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Order |
| 07-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 27-02-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Ganesh Munde's application for temporary custody of his seized Vivo V20 mobile phone, finding insufficient reason to detain it and that the applicant established ownership through FIR, Aadhaar card, and purchase receipt. The court directed the Investigation Officer to photograph the phone, prepare a Panchanama, and release it to the applicant upon execution of a ₹13,000 indemnity bond with conditions that the phone not be sold or disposed of and be produced as directed until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed Ganesh Munde's application for temporary custody of his seized Vivo V20 mobile phone, finding insufficient reason to detain it and that the applicant established ownership through FIR, Aadhaar card, and purchase receipt. The court directed the Investigation Officer to photograph the phone, prepare a Panchanama, and release it to the applicant upon execution of a ₹13,000 indemnity bond with conditions that the phone not be sold or disposed of and be produced as directed until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts