Narote Yogesh Martand vs Railway Protection Force, Parli V — 100/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHBI130004832026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
324/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
100/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parli
Judge
3-Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Narote Yogesh Martand
Adv. JAGATKAR VINOD MARUTIRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Railway Protection Force, Parli V
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court allowed the application and ordered temporary release of the seized John Deere tractor to applicant Narote Yogesh Martand, finding prima facie that he is the vehicle's owner and there is no sufficient reason for continued detention. The release is conditional on executing a ₹10 lakh indemnity bond, obtaining vehicle insurance, and producing the tractor as directed until the underlying Railway Act crime is decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath
-
02-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 100/2026
The court allowed the application and ordered temporary release of the seized John Deere tractor to applicant Narote Yogesh Martand, finding prima facie that he is the vehicle's owner and there is no sufficient reason for continued detention. The release is conditional on executing a ₹10 lakh indemnity bond, obtaining vehicle insurance, and producing the tractor as directed until the underlying Railway Act crime is decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts