Sunita Pappu Alias Papu Suryawanshi vs State of Maharashtra - Rural Police Station Parli V. — 95/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI130004412026

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

295/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

95/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parli

Judge

2-Joint Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

Rural Police Station Parli V

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunita Pappu Alias Papu Suryawanshi

    Adv. UJGARE DEELIP SAMBHAJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra - Rural Police Station Parli V.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed Sunita Suryawanshi's application for temporary custody of her seized Vivo mobile phone, finding prima facie evidence of her ownership through Aadhar card and purchase receipt, with no sufficient reason for continued detention. The court directed the Investigation Officer to photograph the device, prepare a Panchanama, and hand it over to the applicant upon execution of a ₹20,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that the phone not be sold or disposed of and be produced as directed until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    Joint Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    Joint Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    Joint Cjjd And JMFC Parli Vaijnath

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 95/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Sunita Suryawanshi's application for temporary custody of her seized Vivo mobile phone, finding prima facie evidence of her ownership through Aadhar card and purchase receipt, with no sufficient reason for continued detention. The court directed the Investigation Officer to photograph the device, prepare a Panchanama, and hand it over to the applicant upon execution of a ₹20,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that the phone not be sold or disposed of and be produced as directed until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case