Dnyanoba Vitthal Mule vs Nil — 67/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section Heirship. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 05th May 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI130002692026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

29-01-2026

Filing Number

85/2026

Filing Date

30-01-2026

Registration No

67/2026

Registration Date

31-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parli

Judge

3-CJJD AND JMFC PARLI VAIJNATH

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section Heirship

Petitioner(s)

Dnyanoba Vitthal Mule

Adv. AGHAV LAXMAN PRABHAKAR

Respondent(s)

Nil

Hearing History

Judge: 3-CJJD AND JMFC PARLI VAIJNATH

05-05-2026

Disposed

13-04-2026

Order on Exh

27-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Compliance

31-01-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court granted the applicant Jnanoba Vitthol Mulhe's petition for a succession certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827. The court found that the applicant is the sole legal heir of the deceased Gangaram P. Kanu Mulhe (who died on 06/04/2011), as the deceased had no other living heirs, and ordered the issuance of a succession certificate after payment of court fees. No objections were received during the public notice period, and the documentary and testimonial evidence established the applicant's status as the rightful heir. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted the applicant Jnanoba Vitthol Mulhe's petition for a succession certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827. The court found that the applicant is the sole legal heir of the deceased Gangaram P. Kanu Mulhe (who died on 06/04/2011), as the deceased had no other living heirs, and ordered the issuance of a succession certificate after payment of court fees. No objections were received during the public notice period, and the documentary and testimonial evidence established the applicant's status as the rightful heir. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case