Vaijnath Doulat Munde vs Shridhar Janardhan Munde Advocate - Gitte S.M. — 32/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI130002652018
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
89/2018
Filing Date
03-02-2018
Registration No
32/2018
Registration Date
03-02-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parli
Judge
3-CJJD AND JMFC PARLI VAIJNATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vaijnath Doulat Munde
Adv. Andhale J.L.
Doulat Janardhan Munde
Adv. Andhale J.L.
Manubai Doulat Munde
Adv. Andhale J.L.
Respondent(s)
Shridhar Janardhan Munde Advocate - Gitte S.M.
Somnath Shridhar Munde
Adv. Gitte S.M.
Sambaji Shridhar Munde
Adv. Gitte S.M.
Anjana Shridhar Munde
Adv. Gitte S.M.
Kiskinda Eknath Munde
Adv. Nagargoje V.B.
Mina Eknath Munde
Subhash Eknath Munde
Hearing History
Judge: 3-CJJD AND JMFC PARLI VAIJNATH
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 04-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 12-09-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, permitting corrections to property descriptions and addition of omitted ancestral/joint family properties in this partition suit. The court found the amendments necessary and clarificatory in nature to prevent multiplicity of proceedings and ensure complete resolution of all family properties. The plaintiffs were directed to submit the amended plaint within 14 days and ordered to pay Rs. 200 costs to the defendants for the delay caused by the plaintiff's fault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, permitting corrections to property descriptions and addition of omitted ancestral/joint family properties in this partition suit. The court found the amendments necessary and clarificatory in nature to prevent multiplicity of proceedings and ensure complete resolution of all family properties. The plaintiffs were directed to submit the amended plaint within 14 days and ordered to pay Rs. 200 costs to the defendants for the delay caused by the plaintiff's fault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts