STATE OF MAHARASHTRA through p s dindrud vs Rama @ Sunil Sakharam More and others Advocate - Kulkarni V.A. — 188/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 435506,34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHBI120014772021

Filing Number

715/2021

Filing Date

18-Dec-2021

Registration No

188/2021

Registration Date

18-Dec-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Dharur

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 435506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA through p s dindrud

    Adv. APp

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rama @ Sunil Sakharam More and others Advocate - Kulkarni V.A.

  2. 2.Shindu Rama @ Sunil More

  3. 3.Omkar Rama @ Sunil More

  4. 4.Shubham @ Bhaiya Rama @ sunil More

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  7. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  8. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  9. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  10. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  11. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  12. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  13. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  14. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  15. 18-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  16. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  17. 29-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  18. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  19. 13-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  20. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  21. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  22. 08-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  23. 23-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  24. 25-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  25. 26-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  26. 16-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  27. 13-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  28. 29-Mar-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction against defendants to prevent obstruction of the plaintiff's right of way across the disputed property. The court found that the Tahsildar's order of July 21, 2020, properly demarcated a 4-foot-wide passage through the property, and defendants' use of this path for agricultural purposes does not constitute unlawful interference. The plaintiff's appeal was rejected as the court determined no irreparable injury warranting interim relief had been established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  29. 29-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  30. 14-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  31. 10-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  32. 14-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  33. 15-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  34. 02-Sep-2022

    Appearance

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  35. 02-Jul-2022

    Appearance

    CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.

  36. 18-Apr-2022

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Dharur

  37. 18-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 18-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 188/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction against defendants to prevent obstruction of the plaintiff's right of way across the disputed property. The court found that the Tahsildar's order of July 21, 2020, properly demarcated a 4-foot-wide passage through the property, and defendants' use of this path for agricultural purposes does not constitute unlawful interference. The plaintiff's appeal was rejected as the court determined no irreparable injury warranting interim relief had been established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case