Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. vs Rambhau Gyandev Solanke — 1300169/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 20,11. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI120010972015
Next Hearing
13th July 2026
Filing Number
1300278/2015
Filing Date
07-12-2015
Registration No
1300169/2015
Registration Date
07-12-2015
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dharur
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC DHARUR.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.
Adv. Gaisamudre R.K.
Respondent(s)
Rambhau Gyandev Solanke
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC DHARUR.
Dismissal Order
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The court partially allowed the defendant's appeal in Civil Case No. 169/2015. The court set aside the plaintiff's decree dated 15-01-2018 and remanded the case for reconsideration, directing the defendant to furnish an affidavit with supporting documents and the plaintiff to pay the defendant legal costs of Rs. 1,000 before proceeding further. The court found that the defendant was not properly served notice and was entitled to contest the original claim on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court partially allowed the defendant's appeal in Civil Case No. 169/2015. The court set aside the plaintiff's decree dated 15-01-2018 and remanded the case for reconsideration, directing the defendant to furnish an affidavit with supporting documents and the plaintiff to pay the defendant legal costs of Rs. 1,000 before proceeding further. The court found that the defendant was not properly served notice and was entitled to contest the original claim on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts