Ganesh Shankarrao Solanke vs Lalasaheb Anjanrao Solanke Advocate - Munde N.M. — 17/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 17. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI120000372025
e-Filing Number
06-01-2025
Filing Number
27/2025
Filing Date
07-Jan-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
07-Jan-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dharur
Judge
2-CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ganesh Shankarrao Solanke
Adv. SAKHARE AMOL SAMPATRAO
-
2.Ragini Ganeshrao Solanke
Adv. SAKHARE AMOL SAMPATRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Lalasaheb Anjanrao Solanke Advocate - Munde N.M.
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.
-
04-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application for extension of time to file a reply to the defendant's written statement in a property dispute case (Regular Civil Suit No. 17/2025). The defendant's delayed response was accepted on grounds of natural justice, as the case involves immovable property. The court imposed costs of Rs. 300/- on the defendant for the delay in filing the reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. JMFC Dharur.
-
19-Jul-2025
Reply/Say
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Dharur
-
20-Jun-2025
Reply/Say
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Dharur
-
22-Apr-2025
Reply/Say
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Dharur
-
26-Mar-2025
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Dharur
-
05-Mar-2025
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Dharur
-
12-Feb-2025
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Dharur
-
07-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2025
Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application for extension of time to file a reply to the defendant's written statement in a property dispute case (Regular Civil Suit No. 17/2025). The defendant's delayed response was accepted on grounds of natural justice, as the case involves immovable property. The court imposed costs of Rs. 300/- on the defendant for the delay in filing the reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts