Shantabai Gangadhar Mote vs nill — 1037/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI110041902025

e-Filing Number

17-12-2025

Filing Number

1981/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

1037/2025

Registration Date

19-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Georai

Judge

3-Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shantabai Gangadhar Mote

    Adv. AMBAT RAVI RAMLU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.nill

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed by the respondent challenging the validity of the appointment/order. The court held that the petitioner had no legal standing to challenge the administrative action as it was made in accordance with proper procedure and statutory provisions. The court found no merit in the grounds raised and upheld the original decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1037/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed by the respondent challenging the validity of the appointment/order. The court held that the petitioner had no legal standing to challenge the administrative action as it was made in accordance with proper procedure and statutory provisions. The court found no merit in the grounds raised and upheld the original decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case