STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Kiran Ashok Raode — 920/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI110034662024
Filing Number
1736/2024
Filing Date
11-Nov-2024
Registration No
920/2024
Registration Date
12-Nov-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Georai
Judge
2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
255
Police Station
Georai Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kiran Ashok Raode
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The court discharged accused Kiran Ashok Rawade under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973, in a liquor prohibition case (Section 65(e) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949) due to inability to secure his presence despite prolonged efforts and lack of case progress. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings by showing justifiable grounds, while seized liquor and worthless equipment are to be disposed of appropriately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
20-Feb-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
10-Dec-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
22-Sep-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
24-Jun-2025
Appearance
4th Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
03-Apr-2025
Appearance
4th Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
21-Jan-2025
Appearance
4th Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
13-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 920/2024
Summary The court discharged accused Kiran Ashok Rawade under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973, in a liquor prohibition case (Section 65(e) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949) due to inability to secure his presence despite prolonged efforts and lack of case progress. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings by showing justifiable grounds, while seized liquor and worthless equipment are to be disposed of appropriately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts