Sandip Kishorlal Bhandari vs Ravindra Kishorlal Bhandari — 839/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th April 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI110033712025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-10-2025

Filing Number

1587/2025

Filing Date

09-10-2025

Registration No

839/2025

Registration Date

10-10-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Georai

Judge

3-Jt. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Sandip Kishorlal Bhandari

Adv. Kute P. M.

Respondent(s)

Ravindra Kishorlal Bhandari

Sachin Kishorlal Bhandari

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Jt. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI

16-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Order on Exh

12-03-2026

Order on Exh

20-01-2026

Awaiting Notice

06-12-2025

Awaiting Notice

Final Orders / Judgements

16-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court granted the petitioner's application for a succession certificate, declaring the petitioner and two respondents as the legitimate heirs of Sumnabai (deceased on 16/12/1996) who died intestate. The court found that the petitioner had sufficiently proven through affidavits and documentary evidence (death certificates, property records) that they are the deceased's children, and since respondents failed to contest the claims despite proper notice, the application was allowed ex parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted the petitioner's application for a succession certificate, declaring the petitioner and two respondents as the legitimate heirs of Sumnabai (deceased on 16/12/1996) who died intestate. The court found that the petitioner had sufficiently proven through affidavits and documentary evidence (death certificates, property records) that they are the deceased's children, and since respondents failed to contest the claims despite proper notice, the application was allowed ex parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Georai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case