STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Sharad Sundar Kapse — 787/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI110028222024
Filing Number
1438/2024
Filing Date
06-Sep-2024
Registration No
787/2024
Registration Date
09-Sep-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Georai
Judge
3-Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
117
Police Station
Chaklamba Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sharad Sundar Kapse
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and discharged the accused from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, citing the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite repeated summons and warrants, combined with no immediate prospects of arrest. The court also directed disposal of the seized country liquor and finalized custody of a seized motorcycle to the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
27-Jan-2026
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
12-Nov-2025
Appearance
Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
08-Sep-2025
Appearance
Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
28-Jul-2025
Appearance
Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
19-Apr-2025
Appearance
Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
13-Feb-2025
Appearance
Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
19-Dec-2024
Appearance
Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
11-Nov-2024
Appearance
Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
10-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 787/2024
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and discharged the accused from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, citing the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite repeated summons and warrants, combined with no immediate prospects of arrest. The court also directed disposal of the seized country liquor and finalized custody of a seized motorcycle to the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts