Vasaram Balu Rathod vs Udhav Shrimant Khade — 649/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34and38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI110026712024
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
e-Filing Number
22-08-2024
Filing Number
1313/2024
Filing Date
23-08-2024
Registration No
649/2024
Registration Date
27-08-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Georai
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vasaram Balu Rathod
Adv. Yewale S.P.
Respondent(s)
Udhav Shrimant Khade
Bhagwan Shrimant Khade
Rameshwar Shriram Khade
Shivaji Shriram Khade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 01-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 07-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: RCS No. 649/2024 (Vasaram vs. Uddhav) Court: Civil Judge, Junior Division, Georai Date: 14/02/2025 Outcome: Defendant No. 4's application to file his written statement and say on the interim injunction application was allowed, subject to payment of Rs. 200 cost to the plaintiff on or before the next date. Upon payment, his pursis filed on 16.01.2025 will be treated as duly filed, though the order shall be vacated if the cost is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: RCS No. 649/2024 (Vasaram vs. Uddhav) Court: Civil Judge, Junior Division, Georai Date: 14/02/2025 Outcome: Defendant No. 4's application to file his written statement and say on the interim injunction application was allowed, subject to payment of Rs. 200 cost to the plaintiff on or before the next date. Upon payment, his pursis filed on 16.01.2025 will be treated as duly filed, though the order shall be vacated if the cost is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts